Forum Of Peteness

Prohibiting an expression that is unacceptable to us, but that exists and represents a part of society, seems inconvenient because, far from promoting the possibility of filing it, encapsulating it and (later) liquefying it politically, Won't it be too little? There are, however, those who ask: is it a priority to defend the values ​​of formal democracy or even promote the recognition of other rights in a world in which material inequality is advancing at a rapid pace.

 Was it not the loss of centrality of the economic that caused the advance of Phone Number List rights that endanger democracies? Answering these questions without first discussing what these rights consist of that trample on what has been built over several decades (not only by capitalism, but against it) is sterile. For now, different specialists who do not agree among themselves on other points do seem to agree that these radicalized right and ultras do not depend on the presence of material inequalities, but it is the advance of a sense of loss or dispossession that cannot be channeled by political representatives.



That's where it's worth looking. And this is the terrain on which it is urgent to act so that the part of society that feels excluded from representation and frustrated in its aspirations (beyond its income) does not turn to the right. Does that mean leaving aside the economy? Not at all. But it happens that actions in this field, necessary and peremptory in Latin America, do not imply guarantees for the issue.